Responses to the grid connection bill

Every body that answered the consultation, with where it stands.

56 responses
NorrlandskraftEnergy companySupports—3ENErik NyströmBacks the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
Skogsägarna NorrLandownersWith conditionsLocal benefitCourt capacity18JBJohan BergFor the bill, on condition that compensation is settled before work starts.
Elnät SydGrid operatorSupports—7JBJohan BergSupports the proposal and wants it in force a year earlier.
FjällvärnetEnvironmental groupSupports—22AHAmira HaddadBacks the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
Miljöprövningsnämnden ÖstAuthorityWith conditionsCompensation firstAppeal deadlinesCourt capacity7—For the bill, on condition that compensation is settled before work starts.
Solgården EnergiEnergy companySupports—32AHAmira HaddadWelcomes the bill; asks only that the transition rules are made clearer.
Älvräddarna MittEnvironmental groupOpposesSpecies surveysAppeal deadlinesCourt capacity38JBJohan BergAgainst: the courts lack the capacity the timetable assumes.
Kustvind SydEnergy companySupports—2JBJohan BergWelcomes the bill; asks only that the transition rules are made clearer.
Östholma kommunMunicipalitySupports—2ENErik NyströmBacks the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
Bottenvikens EnergiEnergy companySupports—42ENErik NyströmSupports the proposal and wants it in force a year earlier.
Mälarkraft ÖstEnergy companyNo position—42ENErik NyströmTakes no position; describes how the rules are applied today.
Storforsa kommunMunicipalityWith conditionsSpecies surveysCourt capacity32SLSara LindSupports the limit if municipalities share in the benefit of a connection.
Kustnaturens RöstEnvironmental groupWith conditionsSpecies surveysCompensation first2—For the bill, on condition that compensation is settled before work starts.
Stamnät MittGrid operatorWith conditionsLocal benefitSpecies surveys7ENErik NyströmSupports the limit if municipalities share in the benefit of a connection.
KulturmiljörådetAuthoritySupports—3AHAmira HaddadWelcomes the bill; asks only that the transition rules are made clearer.
Nordsund VindEnergy companySupports—9—Supports the proposal and wants it in force a year earlier.
Länsrådet VästAuthorityOpposes—16AHAmira HaddadRejects the twelve-month limit as too short for a proper environmental review.
Solforsa kommunMunicipalitySupports—9—Backs the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
KustnätGrid operatorWith conditionsCompensation firstAppeal deadlinesCourt capacity3ENErik NyströmAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Lokalnät DalarnaGrid operatorSupports—15JBJohan BergBacks the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
Tallviks kommunMunicipalityOpposesLocal benefitCompensation firstAppeal deadlinesCourt capacity42—Opposes any change to the municipal veto and the shorter appeal period.
Bodviks kommunMunicipalityWith conditionsSpecies surveysAppeal deadlinesCourt capacity26JBJohan BergAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Dalälvens KraftEnergy companySupports—33JBJohan BergBacks the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
Länsrådet NorrAuthorityWith conditionsLocal benefitCompensation first2JBJohan BergSupports the limit if municipalities share in the benefit of a connection.
Kustbygdens MarkägareLandownersWith conditionsCourt capacity44ENErik NyströmFor the bill, on condition that compensation is settled before work starts.
Rennäringens MiljörådEnvironmental groupWith conditionsLocal benefitSpecies surveysCourt capacity8SLSara LindSupports the limit if municipalities share in the benefit of a connection.
VåtmarksfondenEnvironmental groupOpposesSpecies surveysCompensation first43JBJohan BergOpposes any change to the municipal veto and the shorter appeal period.
Jordägarförbundet SydLandownersOpposes—5SLSara LindRejects the twelve-month limit as too short for a proper environmental review.
Orrsjö kommunMunicipalityWith conditionsAppeal deadlines33JBJohan BergAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
NaturvårdsringenEnvironmental groupOpposesSpecies surveysCourt capacity26ENErik NyströmAgainst: the courts lack the capacity the timetable assumes.
Havsvind NorrEnergy companyWith conditionsSpecies surveysCompensation firstAppeal deadlines47ENErik NyströmAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Regionnät VästGrid operatorOpposesAppeal deadlines38JBJohan BergOpposes any change to the municipal veto and the shorter appeal period.
Fjällbygdens SamfällighetLandownersWith conditionsSpecies surveys4AHAmira HaddadAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Älvmarks kommunMunicipalityWith conditionsLocal benefitCompensation firstCourt capacity25—Accepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Energitillsynen MittAuthorityWith conditionsSpecies surveysCompensation first2AHAmira HaddadFor the bill, on condition that compensation is settled before work starts.
Kommunförbundet NorrMunicipalityWith conditionsSpecies surveysCompensation firstCourt capacity6AHAmira HaddadAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Ekelsta kommunMunicipalitySupports—10ENErik NyströmBacks the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
NaturmyndighetenAuthoritySupports—8—Supports the proposal and wants it in force a year earlier.
Ljusnäs kommunMunicipalityOpposesSpecies surveysCourt capacity11SLSara LindAgainst: the courts lack the capacity the timetable assumes.
Hagvalla kommunMunicipalityWith conditionsLocal benefitSpecies surveys45—For the bill, on condition that compensation is settled before work starts.
FörsvarssamrådetAuthorityWith conditionsSpecies surveysAppeal deadlines31SLSara LindAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Västerhavs VindEnergy companySupports—8—Backs the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.
Fågelskyddet NorrEnvironmental groupOpposesCompensation firstAppeal deadlines14AHAmira HaddadAgainst: the courts lack the capacity the timetable assumes.
HavsmiljöforumEnvironmental groupOpposesSpecies surveysCourt capacity3SLSara LindAgainst: the courts lack the capacity the timetable assumes.
Sundviks kommunMunicipalityWith conditionsSpecies surveysAppeal deadlinesCourt capacity14AHAmira HaddadAccepts the single window provided species surveys keep their full season.
Bergslagens ElnätGrid operatorWith conditionsSpecies surveysCourt capacity46SLSara LindSupports the limit if municipalities share in the benefit of a connection.
Myrbacka kommunMunicipalityWith conditionsCourt capacity4SLSara LindFor the bill, on condition that compensation is settled before work starts.
Byalaget i ÄlvmarkLandownersWith conditionsCompensation firstAppeal deadlinesCourt capacity2—Supports the limit if municipalities share in the benefit of a connection.
Jordbrukets MarkrådLandownersWith conditionsCompensation firstCourt capacity20—Supports the limit if municipalities share in the benefit of a connection.
Ljusvik EnergiEnergy companySupports—4JBJohan BergBacks the single permit window and the twelve-month limit without changes.